Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has submitted a resolution in the Punjab Assembly, calling for the federal government to impose a ban on the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The resolution, spearheaded by MPA Uzma Kardar, accuses the PTI of creating unrest, inciting violence, and causing significant economic losses under the guise of political activity.
The move comes in the wake of recent violent protests led by the PTI, which the PML-N claims have repeatedly targeted state institutions and disrupted international events such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, visits by foreign dignitaries, and activities tied to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
PPP Opposes Ban, Calls for Mainstreaming PTI
While the resolution has been supported by the ruling PML-N, their ally, the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), has expressed opposition. Punjab PPP General Secretary Syed Hassan Murtaza emphasized the importance of dialogue over exclusionary tactics.
“We are not in favor of banning the PTI or sidelining it,” Murtaza stated during a press conference, urging the government to bring PTI back into the national mainstream through political dialogue. Murtaza also criticized PTI leaders, such as Ali Amin Gandapur, for their aggressive tactics and disregard for the concerns of their constituencies.
Former Senate Chairman Mian Raza Rabbani echoed these sentiments, warning against the historical pitfalls of banning political parties. He cited past attempts to proscribe groups like the National Awami Party (NAP) and the Communist Party of Pakistan, questioning their efficacy in achieving long-term political stability.
PTI’s Protests and Economic Impact
The resolution highlights several recent incidents, including the PTI’s November 24 protest led by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur. The PML-N alleges that these protests resulted in the martyrdom of security personnel, violated Islamabad High Court orders, and caused financial losses amounting to Rs190 billion daily.
The resolution also accuses PTI of repeating the violent patterns of the May 9, 2023, riots. It claims that PTI leaders have consistently used state machinery and resources to incite public unrest, damaging Pakistan’s international reputation and economic stability.
PTI, on the other hand, submitted a counter-resolution condemning alleged “indiscriminate firing” on its peaceful protesters during the November 26 march at D-Chowk in Islamabad. The party criticized the imposition of Section 144 across Punjab, which they claim restricted citizens’ mobility and even led to casualties in ambulances stuck in traffic.
Divergence Among Allies
The PPP has also voiced concerns over the lack of consultation before submitting the resolution. “When they [the government] contact us, we will decide after considering the entire context,” said Murtaza. Despite being an ally, the PPP remains cautious about supporting measures that could further polarize the political landscape.
Lessons from History or Repetition of Mistakes?
The proposed ban on PTI raises important questions about the balance between accountability and political inclusion in Pakistan’s democratic system. With the economy already under strain, will sidelining a major opposition party lead to further unrest or foster much-needed stability?
Should the government prioritize dialogue over punitive measures to address political unrest?
Related Stories:
Protests escalate in Pakistan as Islamabad remains under Lockdown over Imran Khan’s detention
Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi face ‘terrorism’ charges after Islamabad protests
Major Protests Erupt in Pakistan as Supporters Demand Imran Khan’s Release
Thousands Rally in Islamabad for Ex-PM Imran Khan’s Release
