The Trump administration has systematically erased critical terms linked to diversity, gender identity, and climate change from federal documents, raising serious concerns about censorship and ideological control. An investigation by The New York Times uncovered over 5,000 pages of agency records revealing the deliberate removal of words deemed too “politically charged” for government communications.
While Trump and his allies have often positioned themselves as defenders of free speech, their actions paint a starkly different picture—one of linguistic suppression that aligns with a broader ideological agenda.
Which Words Are Being Scrubbed?
The Trump administration has quietly instructed government agencies to limit or avoid certain terms in official materials. Although these words haven’t been outright banned, their use has been discouraged in policies, grants, and public statements, creating a chilling effect. Here are the key casualties of this language purge:
Diversity and Inclusion
- Activism
- Activists
- Advocacy
- Advocate
- Advocates
- Affirming care
- All-inclusive
- Allyship
- Anti-racism
- Antiracist
- Assigned at birth
- Assigned female at birth
- Assigned male at birth
- At risk
- Barrier
- Barriers
- Belong
- Bias
- Biased
- Biased toward
- Biases
- Biases towards
- Biologically female
- Biologically male
- BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color)
- Black
- Breastfeed + people
- Breastfeed + person
- Chestfeed + people
- Chestfeed + person
- Clean energy
- Climate crisis
- Climate science
- Commercial sex worker
- Community diversity
- Community equity
- Confirmation bias
- Cultural competence
- Cultural differences
- Cultural heritage
- Cultural sensitivity
- Culturally appropriate
- Culturally responsive
- DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion)
- DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility)
- DEIAB (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Anti-Bias)
- DEIJ (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice)
- Discriminated
- Discrimination
- Discriminatory
- Disparity
- Diverse
- Diverse backgrounds
- Diverse communities
- Diverse community
- Diverse group
- Diverse groups
- Diversified
- Diversify
- Diversifying
- Diversity
- Enhance the diversity
- Enhancing diversity
- Environmental quality
- Equal opportunity
- Equality
- Equitable
- Equitableness
- Equity
- Ethnicity
- Excluded
- Exclusion
- Expression
- Female
- Females
- Feminism
- Fostering inclusivity
- GBV (Gender-based Violence)
- Gender
- Gender-based
- Gender-based violence
- Gender diversity
- Gender identity
- Gender ideology
- Gender-affirming care
- Genders
- Gulf of Mexico
- Hate speech
- Health disparity
- Health equity
- Hispanic minority
- Historically
- Identity
- Immigrants
- Implicit bias
- Implicit biases
- Inclusion
- Inclusive
- Inclusive leadership
- Inclusiveness
- Inclusivity
- Increase diversity
- Increase the diversity
- Indigenous community
- Inequalities
- Inequality
- Inequitable
- Inequities
- Inequity
- Injustice
- Institutional
- Intersectional
- Intersectionality
- Key groups
- Key people
- Key populations
- Latinx
- LGBT
- LGBTQ
- Marginalize
- Marginalized
- Men who have sex with men
- Mental health
- Minorities
- Minority
- Most risk
- MSM (Men who have sex with men)
- Multicultural
- Mx (Gender-neutral honorific)
- Native American
- Non-binary
- Nonbinary
- Oppression
- Oppressive
- Orientation
- People + uterus
- People-centered care
- Person-centered care
- Person-centered
- Polarization
- Political
- Pollution
- Pregnant people
- Pregnant person
- Pregnant persons
- Prejudice
- Privilege
- Privileges
- Promote diversity
- Promoting diversity
- Pronoun
- Pronouns
- Prostitute
- Race
- Race and ethnicity
- Racial
- Racial diversity
- Racial identity
- Racial inequality
- Racial justice
- Racially
- Racism
- Segregation
- Sense of belonging
- Sex
- Sexual preferences
- Sexuality
- Social justice
- Sociocultural
- Socioeconomic
- Status
- Stereotype
- Stereotypes
- Systemic
- Systemically
- They/them (as singular pronouns)
- Trans
- Transgender
- Transsexual
- Trauma
- Traumatic
- Tribal
- Unconscious bias
- Underappreciated
- Underprivileged
- Underrepresentation
- Underrepresented
- Underserved
- Undervalued
- Victim
- Victims
- Vulnerable populations
- Women
- Women and underrepresented
Censorship or Strategic Policy Shift?
The administration defends this move as an effort to depoliticize government agencies, claiming these words promote ideological bias. Trump has long criticized diversity initiatives and climate policies as tools of left-wing indoctrination. His executive orders have dismantled diversity training, weakened gender protections, and rolled back environmental regulations.
Critics, however, argue that this is not about neutrality—it’s about silencing discussions on marginalized communities and pressing global challenges. By erasing language, the administration effectively erases the issues themselves, limiting their visibility in policy debates.
The Free Speech Contradiction
Trump presents himself as a free speech advocate, railing against so-called “cancel culture.” Yet, by systematically restricting language in federal agencies, his administration is engaging in its own form of suppression.
This linguistic purge mirrors broader legal efforts to curtail DEI initiatives, defund gender-inclusive programs, and dismantle climate policies. The crackdown extends beyond semantics—it has real-world consequences for funding, legislation, and protections for vulnerable groups.
Impact: Funding, Policies, and Public Awareness
The removal of these terms is already reshaping government programs:
Education
- The Department of Education has removed nonbinary identification options from federal student aid applications.
- Schools receiving federal funding have been discouraged from referencing “gender-affirming care” in counseling services.
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- HUD has scaled back protections for transgender individuals in federally funded shelters, citing the absence of “gender identity” in regulations.
Public Health and Environmental Policy
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer references “health equity” in key reports.
- Climate programs have been stripped of terms like “environmental justice” and “clean energy.”
In grant applications, proposals containing these now-sensitive terms are facing increased scrutiny or outright rejection, cutting off resources to programs supporting marginalized communities.
Backlash and Legal Challenges
Civil rights organizations, LGBTQ+ advocates, and climate activists are pushing back. Lawsuits are already emerging, arguing that restricting language in government agencies violates the First Amendment.
Meanwhile, progressive lawmakers are introducing bills to safeguard inclusive language in federal policy. But with Trump’s control over executive agencies, reversing these changes remains an uphill battle.
What’s Next?
As the 2024 election looms, Trump’s language crackdown is fueling debates over free speech, censorship, and government transparency. If left unchallenged, this systematic erasure could redefine how the government communicates—and whose issues are deemed worthy of recognition.
Words shape policy. Their removal isn’t just a change in terminology—it’s a shift in the political landscape. The fight over language is, at its core, a fight over power.
Related stories:
Mahmoud Khalil Arrested by Trump Administration for Pro-Palestine Activism at Columbia University
Trump Shares AI-Generated Video Promoting “Trump Gaza” Resort on Palestinian Ruins
What Is USAID? Trump Puts Its Staff on Leave, Freezing Global Aid
