The COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, has become a battleground over the future of fossil fuels, with significant tensions emerging between developed and developing nations. At the heart of the disagreement is a draft climate agreement that many countries, particularly the UK, European Union (EU), New Zealand, and Ireland, have called “unacceptable.” The draft does not adequately address the urgent need for fossil fuel reduction, which was a central promise of last year’s COP28 agreement.
UK Energy Minister Ed Miliband expressed his concern, stating, “Standing still is retreat and the world will rightly judge us very harshly if this is the outcome.” The criticism has focused on the lack of clear commitment to reducing fossil fuel reliance, a crucial issue in mitigating climate change. The EU Commissioner for Climate Action, Wopke Hoekstra, also condemned the draft, describing it as “unbalanced, unworkable, and unsubtle.”
The absence of stronger language on fossil fuels is seen by many as a setback in global climate efforts, with some diplomats accusing the host country, Azerbaijan, of aligning too closely with oil-producing nations, particularly Saudi Arabia, and other members of the “Like-Minded” group, including China, India, and Bolivia. These countries have been resistant to binding commitments to phase out fossil fuels, citing concerns over their economic growth.
Developing Nations Demand Climate Finance
While fossil fuel commitments remain a sticking point, developing countries are equally dissatisfied with the lack of progress on financial support for climate action. Under the Paris Agreement, developed nations pledged to provide $100 billion annually to help poorer countries transition away from fossil fuels and address the impacts of climate change. However, the draft agreement presented at COP29 does not specify the amount of financial assistance that will be provided to these nations.
The G77 +China group, representing the interests of developing countries, has been vocal in demanding more substantial financial commitments, proposing a target of $1.3 trillion by 2030 to fund climate action. This funding would come from both government contributions and private sector investments. However, no specific financial figure has been mentioned in the draft documents, leading to widespread frustration.
Diego Pacheco, Bolivia’s lead negotiator, expressed his disappointment, saying, “This is not even a joke. This is an offense to the demands of the global south. This is a finance COP and needs political will to provide finance; anything less is a betrayal to the Paris Agreement.”
The lack of clarity on financial contributions has left many developing nations, including the Least Developed Countries Group, deeply concerned. They are particularly wary of additional loans, fearing that increasing debt burdens will further hinder their ability to invest in climate adaptation and mitigation.
The Debate Over Fossil Fuel Transition
One of the most contentious issues at COP29 is the interpretation of the agreement reached at COP28, which called for a “transition away from fossil fuels.” Countries like Saudi Arabia have argued that the transition was not intended to be a binding commitment but rather one of several options for nations to consider. This view has been reflected in the draft agreement presented at COP29, much to the dismay of many other countries, including the EU and the UK.
Ireland’s Minister for the Environment, Eamon Ryan, voiced his frustration, stating, “We all know that there has been backsliding. There has been an attempt to interpret what we agreed last year as a menu, and actually taking back the language and taking back the commitment.”
Samoan Minister Cedric Schuster, speaking on behalf of small island nations that are most vulnerable to climate change, added, “We cannot afford to undermine the progress achieved less than a year ago in Dubai.” These nations are calling for stronger language in the agreement that would ensure a clear commitment to reducing fossil fuel use and limiting global warming.
A Crucial Moment for Climate Negotiations
With COP29 set to conclude in just a few days, the summit is at a critical juncture. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that “failure is not an option,” as the world faces increasingly extreme weather events and the growing threat of climate change. The continued disagreement over fossil fuel reduction and climate finance underscores the deep divisions that remain between developed and developing countries, with the future of global climate negotiations hanging in the balance.
Can COP29 Deliver a Deal That Satisfies All Nations?
As COP29 enters its final days, the question remains: will negotiators be able to bridge the divide between developed and developing countries to reach a meaningful climate agreement?
Related Stories:
COP29 row breaks out with Vatican over gender rights
Argentina Withdraws from COP29, Raising Concerns Over Climate Commitments
