In a recent statement that has stirred significant debate, Dr. Raghib Hussain Naeemi, Chairman of the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), declared the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) as un-Islamic. He emphasized that bypassing restrictions or accessing prohibited websites through VPNs is “impermissible in Islamic law,” urging the government to take immediate action to block immoral or blasphemous content online. According to Dr. Naeemi, VPNs enable users to conceal their true identities and locations, often providing access to government-blocked websites, which he sees as a violation of Islamic principles.
Dr. Naeemi’s statement aligns with the CII’s earlier recommendations to the government, advocating for the swift regulation of VPNs to uphold societal values and prevent illegal online activities.
CII’s Rationale: VPNs and Islamic Ethics
Dr. Naeemi’s decree comes with a firm belief that VPNs are often used to circumvent restrictions set by governments to protect their citizens from harmful or unethical content. The CII chairman noted that the majority of VPN usage in Pakistan is to access immoral or blasphemous material, which he claims goes against the teachings of Islam.
He pointed out that VPNs, by masking the identity of users, can facilitate unlawful activities, such as digital theft and cybercrimes, without the fear of being traced. In Islamic law, actions that enable sinful behavior, particularly when done anonymously, are deemed forbidden, and Dr. Naeemi insists that the government has a religious duty to prevent such practices.
“The permissibility of any action in Islamic law depends on its purpose and method,” said Dr. Naeemi during his public remarks. He further stated that the use of VPNs for accessing restricted material is not only a legal violation but also a moral one that undermines the values upheld by Islamic teachings.
Government’s Role in Regulating VPN Usage
Dr. Naeemi called for the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to expedite the registration process for VPNs. He suggested that only registered VPNs should be allowed to operate, ensuring that users are identifiable, thereby preventing misuse.
He referred to a 2023 consultative meeting where the CII had raised concerns over the use of social media platforms and VPNs to spread harmful or blasphemous content. In his view, government agencies need to be proactive in monitoring and regulating the digital space to protect societal norms and Islamic values.
“Without proper registration and monitoring, VPNs could continue to be misused for accessing sites that are deemed harmful to national integrity and religious teachings,” he said. Dr. Naeemi stressed that prompt action was necessary to maintain digital accountability and curb the spread of immoral content.
Controversy and Public Reaction
The CII chairman’s proclamation has met with mixed reactions. While some support the idea of upholding moral values and protecting the public from harmful content, others argue that the regulation of VPNs could infringe on individual freedoms and restrict access to valuable information.
Critics, including digital rights activists, warn that such measures could lead to government overreach, limiting access to legitimate platforms and websites. Nighat Dad, Executive Director of the Digital Rights Foundation, expressed concerns about the potential impact on privacy rights. She argued that the government should not compromise citizens’ freedoms in the name of morality and security.
“Privacy and freedom of expression are fundamental rights that should not be sacrificed in the name of national security or religious protection,” Dad stated in a recent interview.
The Way Forward: Balancing Security and Freedom?
The debate surrounding VPN usage in Pakistan raises a critical question: How can the government balance the need for national security and religious values with the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of expression? While Dr. Naeemi insists that blocking VPNs is necessary to safeguard Islamic ethics and prevent illegal activities, digital rights organizations argue that such measures may set a dangerous precedent for surveillance and censorship.
Will the government take decisive action on VPN regulation, or will it seek a middle ground that respects both moral imperatives and digital freedoms?
Related Stories:
The Dark Side of Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws
Iran Announces to Open ‘Treatment Clinic’ for Women Defying Hijab Laws
Israel Passes New Law on Imprisonment of Palestinian Children Under 14
