Canada’s hidden arms exports to Israel have come under scrutiny following the United States’ recent approval of a $20 billion weapons sale to Israel. This revelation has shed light on the complex web of international arms trade and the potential loopholes in Canada’s export regulations. As part of this deal, over $60 million worth of munitions will be manufactured by a Canadian company, raising questions about Canada’s compliance with international law and its ethical stance on arms exports to conflict zones.

The US-Canada Defense Partnership

The foundation of Canada’s indirect arms exports to Israel lies in its longstanding Defense Production Sharing Agreement with the United States. This bilateral deal, established in the 1950s, allows for the permit-free movement of most military items between the two countries. While this arrangement has been economically beneficial for Canada, with the US accounting for nearly half of all Canadian defense exports, it has also created a significant loophole in Canada’s arms control mechanisms.

The implications of this agreement became evident when the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced that a Quebec-based company would be the main contractor for $61.1 million worth of mortar cartridges destined for Israel. This transaction would likely occur without regulatory oversight from Canadian officials and would not be included in Canada’s official reporting of arms exports to Israel.

Navigating International Obligations and Domestic Pressures

Canada’s accession to the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) in 2019 has further complicated its arms export policies. The ATT prohibits signatories from transferring weapons to countries where there is a plausible risk of their use in violations of international humanitarian law. However, Canada sought to ensure that joining the ATT wouldn’t affect its existing arms export regime with the US, effectively maintaining a separate standard for its largest trading partner.

This dual approach has drawn criticism from human rights advocates and legal experts who argue that Canada is failing to meet its international and domestic legal commitments. The situation has become particularly contentious in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza, with growing calls for Canada to impose an arms embargo on Israel.

In response to mounting pressure, the Canadian government recently announced it would not authorize new permits for weapons exports to Israel. However, critics point out that existing permits remain active, and the US-Canada agreement still allows for indirect transfers without specific oversight.

Transparency Concerns and Legal Challenges

The opaque nature of Canada’s arms transfers to the US has long been a concern for human rights advocates. The recent revelation about Canadian-made munitions bound for Israel has reignited debates about the lack of transparency in the country’s arms export system. Experts argue that without the US government’s disclosure, Canadians would likely have remained unaware of their country’s involvement in supplying weapons to Israel.

This lack of transparency has prompted legal action. Canadian Lawyers for International Human Rights (CLAIHR) is currently involved in a lawsuit against the Canadian Foreign Minister, demanding an end to Canadian weapons shipments to Israel. The group argues that Canada is legally obligated to prevent these transfers, given the known use of arms in potential violations of international humanitarian law.

The issue of Canada’s hidden arms exports to Israel highlights the complex challenges faced by countries balancing economic interests, international obligations, and ethical considerations in the global arms trade. As pressure mounts for greater transparency and adherence to international law, Canada finds itself at a crossroads. The government must navigate the delicate balance between maintaining its strategic partnership with the United States and upholding its commitments under the Arms Trade Treaty. Moving forward, addressing these concerns will be crucial for Canada to maintain its credibility on the global stage and ensure that its arms export policies align with its stated values and international obligations.

For Updates