On July 25, 2024, Representative Rashida Tlaib, the only Palestinian-American in Congress, made a striking statement by holding up a “war criminal” sign during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to a joint session of the US Congress. This incident, encapsulated by the title Rashida Tlaib Holds ‘War Criminal’ Sign at Netanyahu Address highlights the deep divisions surrounding Israel’s Gaza war and Netanyahu’s contentious visit to Washington.
Tlaib’s protest was multi-faceted and symbolic. In addition to the “war criminal” sign, she displayed another side that read “Guilty of genocide.” The Michigan representative also wore a Palestinian flag pin and a keffiyeh, the black and white scarf long associated with Palestinian resistance. Tlaib’s guest for the event, Hani Almadhoun, a Palestinian who has lost over 150 extended family members in the Gaza conflict, added a personal dimension to her protest.
The address itself was met with mixed reactions from US lawmakers. While some gave Netanyahu a standing ovation, others, including dozens of Democratic members of Congress, chose to boycott the speech entirely. This divide reflects the growing debate within the Democratic Party and the broader American public about US support for Israel’s military actions in Gaza.
Prior to Netanyahu’s address, a coalition of progressives, human rights advocates, former Biden administration officials, and some Democratic lawmakers held a press call to denounce the invitation extended to the Israeli Prime Minister. They called for a US arms embargo on Israel and demanded a ceasefire in Gaza. Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Greg Casar, Pramila Jayapal, and Cori Bush were among those who joined the call and boycotted the speech.
The protesters highlighted the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and criticized the US government’s continued military support for Israel. Pressley stated, “This war, this genocide, has persisted for months as the United States has sent bombs that have claimed the lives of elders, babies, parents, students, journalists and loved ones.” She called for an immediate halt to the transfer and sales of offensive weapons to Israel.
The controversy surrounding Netanyahu’s visit extends beyond Capitol Hill. Thousands of protesters gathered outside the US Capitol to voice their opposition to Israel’s actions in Gaza and the US government’s support for these actions. The demonstrations underscored the growing public concern over the conflict and its impact on Palestinian civilians.
Several former Biden administration officials who resigned in protest of the president’s policies on Israel also joined the call against Netanyahu’s address. Tariq Habash, who resigned in January, argued that inviting Netanyahu to Congress was not in America’s national interest. Lily Greenberg, the first Jewish political appointee to resign over Gaza policy, emphasized the need to fight authoritarianism both at home and abroad.
Notable absences from the address included Vice President Kamala Harris, who was campaigning in Indiana, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who opted to meet with Israeli citizens affected by the October 7 Hamas attack. These absences, particularly Harris’s, were seen by some as strategic choices in light of the controversy surrounding Netanyahu’s visit.
Senator Bernie Sanders, a prominent progressive voice, condemned Netanyahu’s address on the Senate floor, stating, “It will be the first time in American history that a war criminal has been given that honor.” This statement reflects the growing criticism of Netanyahu’s leadership and Israel’s military actions among some segments of the Democratic Party.
The controversy surrounding Netanyahu’s visit and Tlaib’s protest comes amid ongoing debates about US foreign policy in the Middle East. The Biden administration has faced increasing pressure from progressive Democrats and human rights organizations to reevaluate its support for Israel’s military operations in Gaza. As of late June 2024, the US had provided $6.5 billion in security assistance to Israel since the October 7 attack by Hamas.
The divided response to Netanyahu’s address highlights the complex and often contentious nature of US-Israel relations, particularly in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict. It also underscores the growing influence of progressive voices within the Democratic Party who are calling for a more balanced approach to the conflict and greater consideration for Palestinian rights and lives.
As the war in Gaza continues, with mounting civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian crisis, the debate over US policy towards Israel and Palestine is likely to intensify. The actions of lawmakers like Tlaib and the broader protest movement signal a shift in public discourse, challenging long-standing bipartisan support for Israel and demanding a reevaluation of US involvement in the region.
The event captured by the title Rashida Tlaib Holds ‘War Criminal’ Sign at Netanyahu Address symbolizes more than an individual act of defiance. It represents the growing dissent within American politics regarding US support for Israel’s actions in Gaza and the broader Israel-Palestine conflict. As the debate intensifies and calls for policy changes grow louder, Tlaib’s protest sign stands as a powerful emblem of the shifting landscape in US foreign policy discussions and the rising influence of voices advocating for a more balanced and humanitarian approach to Middle East issues.
Related NewsNetanyahu’s Gaza Plan: Congress Address Highlights