Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and 69 of her associates are now under legal scrutiny as a criminal complaint has been filed at the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing them of crimes against humanity. The complaint alleges that Hasina’s administration orchestrated widespread violence against civilians during protests in Bangladesh in July and August 2024. Filed on October 28 by Md Ashraful Arefin, a British lawyer of Bangladeshi origin, the complaint demands an independent probe into alleged atrocities linked to Hasina’s government and law enforcement agencies.
Details of the ICC Filing and Allegations
At a recent press conference in London, Arefin was joined by Barristers Sarah Fore and Emil Lixandru from Bolt Court Chambers, where he presented an extensive array of evidence, including video footage, documents, and testimonies. Arefin accused Bangladeshi security forces of unleashing deadly force on peaceful demonstrators, deploying live ammunition, rubber bullets, and sound grenades. He also alleged that protester bodies were burned and buried in mass graves in a concerted attempt to eliminate evidence of brutality.
“We have submitted thorough documentation, including video clips, records, and numerous eyewitness accounts, showcasing the violent measures taken under Hasina’s administration,” Arefin said, adding that the evidence was presented to facilitate an international investigation that could lead to an ICC arrest warrant against Hasina.
Legal Basis and Challenges for ICC Involvement
The case is filed under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, which enables the ICC prosecutor to initiate investigations based on credible information submitted by individuals. Although Bangladesh is not an ICC member state, the court can still investigate if it deems that crimes fall within its jurisdiction and are of international concern. Arefin stressed the urgency of the ICC’s involvement, given the limitations of Bangladesh’s legal framework.
“The judicial system in Bangladesh is currently compromised by the influence of Hasina-appointed officials,” Arefin said. “An independent and unbiased investigation would be nearly impossible in the current local judicial landscape.”
Additionally, Arefin voiced concerns over the political complications surrounding the case, noting Hasina’s close ties with India, which has historically offered her government political support. However, he suggested that international pressure might encourage India’s cooperation should the ICC issue an arrest warrant, marking a significant escalation in the case’s geopolitical implications.
Background: The Crackdown on Anti-Government Protests
The allegations stem from events in July and August 2024, when widespread protests erupted across Bangladesh, led primarily by students and civil society groups. Protesters demanded accountability from the government and called for an end to corruption, lack of press freedom, and rising authoritarianism. The response from Hasina’s administration was swift and severe, with the deployment of security forces, including the elite Rapid Action Battalion, police, and affiliates of the Awami League, Hasina’s ruling party. The Bangladesh Students’ League, an affiliate of the Awami League, also reportedly assisted in suppressing dissent, sometimes with extreme force.
Witnesses reported scenes of chaos and violence, with tear gas and rubber bullets fired into crowds of unarmed demonstrators. This response prompted a global outcry from human rights organizations, with calls for accountability and immediate investigations into the allegations of unlawful killings, torture, and disappearances.
Transitional Government Response and Actions
Following Hasina’s departure to India on August 5, a transitional government assumed power on August 8, tasked with restoring order and managing the upcoming general elections. In response to mounting domestic and international criticism, the transitional government imposed a ban on the Bangladesh Students’ League, labeling it a terrorist organization due to its role in violent crackdowns. The government has also pledged to improve press freedom and reinstate civic rights curtailed during Hasina’s administration.
On October 17, Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal issued a domestic arrest warrant for Hasina, a move seen as a symbolic attempt to address the mounting allegations. However, local and international human rights advocates remain skeptical of the tribunal’s effectiveness, given its limited reach and susceptibility to political influence.
International Reactions and Potential Ramifications
The ICC case has attracted widespread attention and could signal a new era of accountability for alleged human rights abuses in Bangladesh. International human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have expressed support for the ICC case, arguing that it represents an essential step toward justice for the victims of the brutal crackdown.
Legal experts warn that the case could exacerbate regional tensions, especially considering Bangladesh’s close ties with India. While India has been a long-time ally of Hasina, international pressure may influence India’s stance if an ICC arrest warrant is issued. Additionally, the case has broader implications for other South Asian leaders, as it underscores the ICC’s willingness to address allegations of state-sponsored violence and human rights abuses.
Broader Implications for Justice and Accountability
The ICC case against Hasina highlights the complex challenges of holding former leaders accountable, particularly in countries where political systems have been influenced by the same leaders over extended periods. If the ICC decides to proceed with the investigation, it could set a global precedent, encouraging international courts to take more active roles in addressing alleged human rights violations in countries that are not ICC members.
The situation also underscores the role of the ICC as a court of last resort, providing justice avenues for victims in states where domestic institutions are unable—or unwilling—to pursue accountability. The case reflects a growing demand for global accountability mechanisms to respond to government-led violence and human rights abuses, further underlining the necessity of international intervention when national systems fail.
What’s Next for the ICC and Bangladesh?
As the ICC evaluates the evidence presented by Arefin and his legal team, it will likely consider the broader regional and international implications of the case. If an investigation is formally launched, it could take years to resolve. Meanwhile, the transitional government in Bangladesh faces the task of rebuilding a justice system that can address grievances and restore confidence among citizens and international stakeholders.
The ICC’s potential involvement in Hasina’s case could shape Bangladesh’s political landscape, pushing for reforms that may prevent future abuses. As the world watches, the case also reinforces the importance of international courts in advocating for justice and accountability, especially for those who have suffered at the hands of state-led violence.
In the meantime, advocates hope that the ICC case will bring renewed attention to the importance of transparency and justice, both within Bangladesh and globally. While the ICC’s decision remains pending, the allegations against Sheikh Hasina and her associates represent a critical test for the international justice system, as it navigates the challenges of holding powerful figures accountable for their actions.
Related posts:
Bangladesh’s Workplace Harassment and Gender Discrimination Crisis
Who is Sheikh Hasina? Political Legacy of Bangladesh Leader
Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina’s Journey from a Democratic ICON to an Authoritarian Prime Minister:
